Liberal Forum

Blackvegetable » Yesterday, 2:01 pm » wrote: ↑

Yesterday, 2:01 pm

I KNEW ABOUT IT ON THE 2ND.....

I HAD PROOF.

**** idiot.

 

What exactly was my lie?

Huey » Today, 10:20 am » wrote: ↑

Today, 10:20 am

What exactly was my lie?

The words behind which you boldly stand and even more promptly run from.

Acknowledge that you were answered.
 

Blackvegetable » Today, 10:23 am » wrote: ↑

Today, 10:23 am

The words behind which you boldly stand and even more promptly run from.

Acknowledge that you were answered.
 


 

What words are they?  I have to see you post them in full, with a link.  Ad explain why it is a lie.  You posted no proof on the 2nd.
 
 

Huey » Today, 10:24 am » wrote: ↑

Today, 10:24 am

What words are they?  I have to see you post them in full, with a link.  Ad explain why it is a lie.  You posted no proof on the 2nd.

What difference does that make?

Huey » Today, 10:24 am » wrote: ↑

Today, 10:24 am

What words are they?  I have to see you post them in full, with a link.  Ad explain why it is a lie.  You posted no proof on the 2nd.

That doesn't mean you haven't seen the words....only that you refuse to acknowledge them.

Blackvegetable » Today, 10:32 am » wrote: ↑

Today, 10:32 am

That doesn't mean you haven't seen the words....only that you refuse to acknowledge them.

 

You refuse to use the quote function, with no edits, and clarify what words you are talking about.  Just waiting on you.  

Huey » Today, 10:34 am » wrote: ↑

Today, 10:34 am

You refuse 

Not about me..

It's about your words.

Blackvegetable. » Today, 10:35 am » wrote: ↑

Today, 10:35 am

You refuse to use the quote function, with no edits, and clarify what words you are talking about.  Just waiting on you. 

Not about me..

It's about your words.
 

It is about you refusing to clarify what words you claim are a lie and why they are a lie.  The moment you do I will end this.

I don't care what you knew on the 2nd.  You posted no sources.  Even when I said noether of us could prove any numbers.  That's how I know you are lying.
 

Huey » Today, 10:39 am » wrote: ↑

Today, 10:39 am

It is about you refusing to clarify what words you claim are a lie 

It can't be more clear than the words which constitute the lie.

Blackvegetable » Today, 10:58 am » wrote: ↑

Today, 10:58 am

It is about you refusing to clarify what words you claim are a lie and why they are a lie.  The moment you do I will end this.

I don't care what you knew on the 2nd.  You posted no sources.  Even when I said noether of us could prove any numbers.  That's how I know you are lying.

It can't be more clear than the words which constitute the lie.
 

Words you will not post.  Because you know I did not lie.  
 

Huey » Today, 11:00 am » wrote: ↑

Today, 11:00 am

Words you will not post.  

I've posted them, repeatedly.


And there's more bad news...


viewtopic.php?p=2916536#p2916536


But I'll bet you still insist you "won"..

Blackvegetable » Today, 11:04 am » wrote: ↑

Today, 11:04 am

I've posted them, repeatedly.


And there's more bad news...


viewtopic.php?p=2916536#p2916536


But I'll bet you still insist you "won"..

 

I didn't see that post nor did you mention it when we were discussing the numbers.  If you had we would not be having this discussion.

I didn't lie.  You did post an article BUT you did not mention that article to me.  No lie.
 

Huey » Today, 11:06 am » wrote: ↑

Today, 11:06 am

I didn't see .

Blackvegetable » Today, 11:08 am » wrote: ↑

Today, 11:08 am

Blackvegetable


Huey

I didn't see that post nor did you mention it when we were discussing the numbers.  If you had we would not be having this discussion.

I didn't lie.  You did post an article BUT you did not mention that article to me.  No lie.

 

You are thread confused again.
 

Huey » Today, 11:11 am » wrote: ↑

Today, 11:11 am

You are thread confused again.

Your recall REALLY sucks...

Cannonpointer » 10 Aug 2026, 8:40 pm » wrote: ↑

10 Aug 2026, 8:40 pm

You have your year wrong. It was 1898.

April 21 to August 12. 

That 90 day war is meaningless to the conversation. Unless you are arguing we should treated our God-blessed, courageous, most freedomy military EVER like william mckinney is still president.

I was actually referencing your “fake food” vs canned botulism…referenced in The Jungle by Sinclair Lewis…
 

Blackvegetable » 17 Apr 2026, 2:32 pm » wrote: ↑

17 Apr 2026, 2:32 pm

Let me add that Kennedy comes off like a real naif here...


 

Blackvegetable 1,199,737
1 minute agoHuey » 13 minutes ago » wrote: ↑You have that many because I have more than that from you.  But Huey......

I'm done with that on this thread?That's a lie...

You have been here little less than half the time I have.  If we did not lose most of the old posts you would have hundreds of thousands more post than I have.  You were well over 100,000 when the forum went down.  I was over 80.
 

Huey » Today, 10:36 am » wrote: ↑

Today, 10:36 am

You have been here little less than half the time I have.  If we 

Entirely irrelevant...

Blackvegetable » 7 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

7 minutes ago

You have been here little less than half the time I have.  If we did not lose most of the old posts you would have hundreds of thousands more post than I have.  You were well over 100,000 when the forum went down.  I was over 80.

Entirely irrelevant...
 

Anything that pokes holes in your opinions is labled irrelevant.  It shows you don't have much of life.  It only took you about 4 or 5 years to surpass me.  That is some sick ****.

Huey » 2 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

2 minutes ago

Anything that pokes holes in your opinions is labled irrelevant.  

It has nothing to do with the rate of correspondence between us.