Liberal Forum

Blackvegetable » 38 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

38 minutes ago

Huey » Today, 11:54 am » wrote: ↑

Today, 11:54 am

I doubt Askholio will answer the question.





 

You have yet another question...

But you don't answer them
 

 

I MOSTLY don't answer yours because you rarely answer anyones.  And I particularly don't answer yours when you ask onto avoid answering one of mine.

You reap what you sow, Puss.
 

Huey » Today, 11:18 am » wrote: ↑

Today, 11:18 am

Aw, the village idiot has arrived.  You understand BV supports banning the weapons you CLAIM to own.

He may, regardless we can put our differences aside, and humiliate you. 
 
@Squatchman  made the same claim about another user, Bigsky
 

*Roshambo » 7 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

7 minutes ago

Huey » Today, 11:18 am » wrote: ↑

Today, 11:18 am

Aw, the village idiot has arrived.  You understand BV supports banning the weapons you CLAIM to own.

He may, regardless we can put our differences aside, and humiliate you. 
 
@Squatchman  made the same claim about another user, Bigsky
 

 

Neither of you are doing a very good job.  Figure out that mirrors reflect in reverse and what those wedding rings are? And you butt buddy just got slammed for his reading skills.

Here is a quote for you:

To ban guns because criminals use them is to tell the innocent and law-abiding that their rights and liberties depend not on their own conduct, but on the conduct of the guilty and the lawless, and that the law will permit them to have only such rights and liberties as the lawless will allow. ... For society does not control crime, ever, by forcing the law-abiding to accommodate themselves to the expected behavior of criminals. Society controls crime by forcing the criminals to accommodate themselves to the expected behavior of the law-abiding. – Jeff Snyder, author


 

Huey » 3 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

3 minutes ago

Neither of you are doing a very good job.  Figure out that mirrors reflect in reverse and what those wedding rings are? And you butt buddy just got slammed for his reading skills.

Here is a quote for you:

To ban guns because criminals use them is to tell the innocent and law-abiding that their rights and liberties depend not on their own conduct, but on the conduct of the guilty and the lawless, and that the law will permit them to have only such rights and liberties as the lawless will allow. ... For society does not control crime, ever, by forcing the law-abiding to accommodate themselves to the expected behavior of criminals. Society controls crime by forcing the criminals to accommodate themselves to the expected behavior of the law-abiding. – Jeff Snyder, author

You spent more on a whore than your wedding ring and that is very telling.

**** your quote.

@Blackvegetable   has you dancing like a puppet on his strings. It is hilarious to watch him curb stomp you. "A curb stomping from all angles"

 
 

Huey » Today, 11:54 am » wrote: ↑

Today, 11:54 am

I doubt Askholio will answer the question.

I'm off to the store.  Here is today's carry choice:


Ruger EC9s with ARX Interceptor Polymer defense rounds.


Because the framers, and Bruen say I have a right to carry.

Can you rack the slide without assistance?

 
 

*Roshambo » 22 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

22 minutes ago

Huey » 23 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

23 minutes ago

Neither of you are doing a very good job.  Figure out that mirrors reflect in reverse and what those wedding rings are? And you butt buddy just got slammed for his reading skills.

Here is a quote for you:

To ban guns because criminals use them is to tell the innocent and law-abiding that their rights and liberties depend not on their own conduct, but on the conduct of the guilty and the lawless, and that the law will permit them to have only such rights and liberties as the lawless will allow. ... For society does not control crime, ever, by forcing the law-abiding to accommodate themselves to the expected behavior of criminals. Society controls crime by forcing the criminals to accommodate themselves to the expected behavior of the law-abiding. – Jeff Snyder, author

You spent more on a whore than your supposed wedding ring and that is very telling. I wouldn't consider that a wedding ring. That's a ring for a queer guy that wants to be seen as "straight".

**** your quote.

@Blackvegetable   has you dancing like a puppet on his strings. It is hilarious to watch him curb stomp you. "A curb stomping from all angles"

 
 

 

LMAO!  I was wrong.  Your reading and comprehension skills are worse than his.  That is quite the accomplishment.  Remember I told you the original is locked in a safe?

Oh, Wannabe gun owner, post exactly which post of us curb stomped me.  Are you saying Bruen did not reaffirm my right to carry?  Are you saying that between 1791and 1934 the government did in fact have gun control laws in place?  Are you saying that Burger knows more about what the framers intended than the framers themsleves?

And let me give you a little hint on who is pulling whose strings.  The only reason BV is back here is me.

You two need to up your game.

Another quote:

There’s no such thing as a good gun. There’s no such thing as a bad gun. A gun in the hands of a bad man is a very dangerous thing. A gun in the hands of a good person is no danger to anyone except the bad guys. - Charlton Heston

Are you afraid to agree with any of these quotes, particularly the framers quotes, because BV the Princess will no longer b your friend?
 

*Roshambo » 18 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

18 minutes ago

Can you rack the slide without assistance?

Oh yeah.  You should see how well I shoot it.  Why do you ask, Wannabe Gun Owner? I bet you are wishing you had a S&W M&P 9 MM shield EZ.

Here is another quote for you:

Firearms stand next in importance to the Constitution itself. They are the American people's liberty teeth and keystone under independence.... From the hour the Pilgrims landed to the present day, events, occurrences, and tendencies prove that to ensure peace, security, and happiness, the rifle and pistol are equally indispensable.... The very atmosphere of firearms everywhere restrains evil interference; they deserve a place of honor with all that's good... A free people ought to be armed. - George Washington 

Why do you disagree with the Father of our country?

Huey » 36 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

36 minutes ago

I MOSTLY don't answer yours because you rarely answer anyones.  And I particularly don't answer yours when you ask onto avoid answering one of mine.

You reap what you sow, Puss.

And then there are the questions you won't answer because doing so would make my case.


That doesn't leave many...

You reap what you sow, Puss.

 I'm sure everyone is as certain as I that if I didn't ask any questions you'd answer all of them...

 

Huey » 8 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

8 minutes ago

LMAO!  I was wrong.  Your reading and comprehension skills are worse than his.  That is quite the accomplishment.  Remember I told you the original is locked in a safe?

Oh, Wannabe gun owner, post exactly which post of us curb stomped me.  Are you saying Bruen did not reaffirm my right to carry?  Are you saying that between 1791and 1934 the government did in fact have gun control laws in place?  Are you saying that Burger knows more about what the framers intended than the framers themsleves?

And let me give you a little hint on who is pulling whose strings.  The only reason BV is back here is me.

You two need to up your game.

Another quote:

There’s no such thing as a good gun. There’s no such thing as a bad gun. A gun in the hands of a bad man is a very dangerous thing. A gun in the hands of a good person is no danger to anyone except the bad guys. - Charlton Heston

Are you afraid to agree with any of these quotes, particularly the framers quotes, because BV the Princess will no longer b your friend?

Are you saying that between 1791and 1934 the government did in fact have gun control laws in place?

WTF is that supposed to tell us?

Are you saying that Burger knows more about what the framers intended than the framers themsleves?

He understood the document better than you or any of the people telling you what to think.

Huey » Today, 11:54 am » wrote: ↑

Today, 11:54 am

I doubt Askholio will answer the question.

I'm off to the store.  Here is today's carry choice:


Ruger EC9s with ARX Interceptor Polymer defense rounds.


Because the framers, and Bruen say I have a right to carry.

  Good little piece.
I carry a Glock but am a member of a Ruger forum. I own the 10/22 of course but also a MarkIV .22 target,a GP 100 7 shot .357mag,a .44mag blackhawk and a .44 mag super redhawk. I've only shot one semi auto from Ruger.
 

Huey » 13 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

13 minutes ago

LMAO!  I was wrong.  Your reading and comprehension skills are worse than his.  That is quite the accomplishment.  

This is really quite funny...

 

Blackvegetable » 11 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

11 minutes ago

Huey » 18 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

18 minutes ago

LMAO!  I was wrong.  Your reading and comprehension skills are worse than his.  That is quite the accomplishment.  Remember I told you the original is locked in a safe?

Oh, Wannabe gun owner, post exactly which post of us curb stomped me.  Are you saying Bruen did not reaffirm my right to carry?  Are you saying that between 1791and 1934 the government did in fact have gun control laws in place?  Are you saying that Burger knows more about what the framers intended than the framers themsleves?

And let me give you a little hint on who is pulling whose strings.  The only reason BV is back here is me.

You two need to up your game.

Another quote:

There’s no such thing as a good gun. There’s no such thing as a bad gun. A gun in the hands of a bad man is a very dangerous thing. A gun in the hands of a good person is no danger to anyone except the bad guys. - Charlton Heston

Are you afraid to agree with any of these quotes, particularly the framers quotes, because BV the Princess will no longer b your friend?

Are you saying that between 1791and 1934 the government did in fact have gun control laws in place?

WTF is that supposed to tell us?

Are you saying that Burger knows more about what the framers intended than the framers themsleves?

He understood the document better than you or any of the people telling you what to think.

 

The framers are telling me what to think.

Unfettered access to weapons WS NOT a fraud from 1791 to 1934.the federal government created no gun control laws during that time frame..
 

Huey » 16 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

16 minutes ago

Oh yeah.  You should see how well I shoot it.  Why do you ask, Wannabe Gun Owner? I bet you are wishing you had a S&W M&P 9 MM shield EZ.

Here is another quote for you:

Firearms stand next in importance to the Constitution itself. They are the American people's liberty teeth and keystone under independence.... From the hour the Pilgrims landed to the present day, events, occurrences, and tendencies prove that to ensure peace, security, and happiness, the rifle and pistol are equally indispensable.... The very atmosphere of firearms everywhere restrains evil interference; they deserve a place of honor with all that's good... A free people ought to be armed. - George Washington 

Why do you disagree with the Father of our country?

Search my posting history, I posted a picture of a gun I have. I own many.


 

Squatchman » 7 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

7 minutes ago

Huey » Today, 11:54 am » wrote: ↑

Today, 11:54 am

I doubt Askholio will answer the question.

I'm off to the store.  Here is today's carry choice:


Ruger EC9s with ARX Interceptor Polymer defense rounds.


Because the framers, and Bruen say I have a right to carry.

  Good little piece.
I carry a Glock but am a member of a Ruger forum. I own the 10/22 of course but also a MarkIV .22 target,a GP 100 7 shot .357mag,a .44mag blackhawk and a .44 mag super redhawk. I've only shot one semi auto from Ruger.
 

 

With my body frame it is easy to conceal in the summer.

Blackvegetable » 11 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

11 minutes ago

Huey » 24 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

24 minutes ago

LMAO!  I was wrong.  Your reading and comprehension skills are worse than his.  That is quite the accomplishment.  

This is really quite funny...

 

 

LMAO!  Then explain when I specifically was talking about FEDERAL law you reframed to state and local laws.

Yeah, your idiocy was really quite funny.

Have fun with this one:

Liberalizing concealed carry laws won't lead to a return to the Wild West- though it wouldn't be bad if it did.... in 19th century cattle towns, homicide was confined to transient males who shot each other in saloon disturbances. The per capita robbery rate was 7% of modern New York City's. The burglary rate was 1%. Rape was unknown. - David Kopel, author

TO this point you have confused state/local laws with FEDERAL.  To this point you have implied you and Burger know more of what the Framers intended than the framers themselves, despite the quotes of theirs I posted.
 

Huey » 12 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

12 minutes ago

The framers are telling me what to think.

Unfettered access to weapons WS NOT a fraud from 1791 to 1934.the federal government created no gun control laws during that time frame..

The framers are telling me what to think.

:rofl:  

Unfettered access to weapons WS NOT a fraud from 1791 to 1934.

Yes it is..

Contrary to popular myth, many frontier towns in the American Old West strictly prohibited carrying firearms within municipal limits. Famous locations like Dodge City, Tombstone, and Wichita required visitors and residents to disarm and check their weapons at local saloons, hotels, or the sheriff's office upon arrival.


Why Towns Banned Public Carry

Public safety: Town leaders knew that large concentrations of people, alcohol, and loaded revolvers frequently led to deadly conflicts.



 

*Roshambo » 11 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

11 minutes ago

Huey » 26 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

26 minutes ago

Oh yeah.  You should see how well I shoot it.  Why do you ask, Wannabe Gun Owner? I bet you are wishing you had a S&W M&P 9 MM shield EZ.

Here is another quote for you:

Firearms stand next in importance to the Constitution itself. They are the American people's liberty teeth and keystone under independence.... From the hour the Pilgrims landed to the present day, events, occurrences, and tendencies prove that to ensure peace, security, and happiness, the rifle and pistol are equally indispensable.... The very atmosphere of firearms everywhere restrains evil interference; they deserve a place of honor with all that's good... A free people ought to be armed. - George Washington 

Why do you disagree with the Father of our country?

Search my posting history, I posted a picture of a gun I own. I own many. 

 
 

 

Anyone can get a pic off the internet.

While I do own a Ruger EC9s the pic I used is, of course, off the internet.  Funny that you struck thru Washington's quote.  Sorry yu disagree with it.

Remember the topic of thread, Barney Fife.  Maybe you do own firearms, but they won't let you have ammo.



 

Blackvegetable » 4 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

4 minutes ago

Huey » 12 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

12 minutes ago

The framers are telling me what to think.

Unfettered access to weapons WS NOT a fraud from 1791 to 1934.the federal government created no gun control laws during that time frame..

The framers are telling me what to think.

 

Unfettered access to weapons WS NOT a fraud from 1791 to 1934.

Yes it is..

Contrary to popular myth, many frontier towns in the American Old West strictly prohibited carrying firearms within municipal limits. Famous locations like Dodge City, Tombstone, and Wichita required visitors and residents to disarm and check their weapons at local saloons, hotels, or the sheriff's office upon arrival.


Why Towns Banned Public Carry

Public safety: Town leaders knew that large concentrations of people, alcohol, and loaded revolvers frequently led to deadly conflicts.



 

No ****, Reframey. For the second time that is why I specified FEDERAL Government. WTF is wrong with, Puss?

The right is absolute. In a free nation, government has no authority to forbid me from speaking because I might shout "fire" in a crowded theater. Government has no authority to forbid me from using my fist to defend myself because I might also use it to strike your nose. And government has no authority to forbid me from owning a firearm because I might shoot an innocent victim. Government is there to assure that the full force of the law can be brought against me if I discharge that right in a manner that threatens the rights of others. It does not have the authority to deny me those very rights for fear I might misuse them. - CA State Senator (R) Tom McClintock, 2001

Huey » 7 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

7 minutes ago

LMAO!  Then explain when I specifically was talking about FEDERAL law you reframed to state and local laws.


 

What a cretinous little ****...

If such regs were unconstitutional, they would have been challenged in any part of the US subject to the Constitution. 

 

Huey » 1 minute ago » wrote: ↑

1 minute ago

No ****, Reframey. For the second time that is why I specified FEDERAL Government. WTF is wrong with

Irrelevant