Liberal Forum
Archive
‹
Political Chat Rooms
‹
No Holds Barred Political Forum
‹
K'fools and Candace Owens
K'fools and Candace Owens
By Vegas
15 Aug 2026 11:05 am in No Holds Barred Political Forum
15 Aug 2026 11:05 am
Did anyone watch their debate? K'fools spent 300k to get his *** handed to him.
It was a bloodbath. Candace was calm and beat the shot out of him. I don't think there was even one point that K'fools won in that whole debate. Usually, there is at least a few wins that the overall loser could take home, but he got shut out. If the guy refuses to debate like an adult, then he at least needs to control his body language. When he gets cornered, he shakes. He always does that in every debate.
It was a bloodbath. Candace was calm and beat the shot out of him. I don't think there was even one point that K'fools won in that whole debate. Usually, there is at least a few wins that the overall loser could take home, but he got shut out. If the guy refuses to debate like an adult, then he at least needs to control his body language. When he gets cornered, he shakes. He always does that in every debate.
Blackvegatble's hypcorisy summed up in one post:
[/size]
Blackvegetable » 7 minutes ago » wrote: ↑7 minutes ago
Very simple questions...
From which you are running...
Blackvegetable » 7 minutes ago » wrote: ↑7 minutes ago
Very simple questions...
From which you are running...
15 Aug 2026 11:32 am
Vegas » 31 minutes ago » wrote: ↑ Did anyone watch their debate? K'fools spent 300k to get his *** handed to him.
It was a bloodbath. Candace was calm and beat the shot out of him. I don't think there was even one point that K'fools won in that whole debate. Usually, there is at least a few wins that the overall loser could take home, but he got shut out. If the guy refuses to debate like an adult, then he at least needs to control his body language. When he gets cornered, he shakes. He always does that in every debate.
It is uncanny how similar @Blackvegetable debate strategy is with K'fools. They are 100% the same. Make a claim, then expect the opponent to disprove it. The opponent then challenges them to prove their claim, then BV/K'fools refuses to back their claim, then continues to press their opponent to prove them wrong.
Dishonest frauds debate like that incessantly. They are **** dumber than a box of rocks. K'fool tried that **** on Candace and she just demolished him.
It is uncanny how similar @Blackvegetable debate strategy is with K'fools. They are 100% the same. Make a claim, then expect the opponent to disprove it. The opponent then challenges them to prove their claim, then BV/K'fools refuses to back their claim, then continues to press their opponent to prove them wrong.
Can you post evidence that this is true?
15 Aug 2026 11:39 am
That you answer questions with a question? All I have to do is find one. You want to go there?
Blackvegatble's hypcorisy summed up in one post:
[/size]
Blackvegetable » 7 minutes ago » wrote: ↑7 minutes ago
Very simple questions...
From which you are running...
Blackvegetable » 7 minutes ago » wrote: ↑7 minutes ago
Very simple questions...
From which you are running...
15 Aug 2026 11:42 am
Challenge. Yeah. There you go. Anything else I can help you with?
Blackvegatble's hypcorisy summed up in one post:
[/size]
Blackvegetable » 7 minutes ago » wrote: ↑7 minutes ago
Very simple questions...
From which you are running...
Blackvegetable » 7 minutes ago » wrote: ↑7 minutes ago
Very simple questions...
From which you are running...
15 Aug 2026 11:46 am
That's a word...not evidence..
Evidence would look like this
https://archive.liberalforum.net/p/38283
15 Aug 2026 11:47 am
The challenge proves all of it. All! Which is why your cowardly *** refuses to take the challenge.
Didn't click it. I will not entertain your stalking.
Define it yourself. I am not your mother.
Blackvegatble's hypcorisy summed up in one post:
[/size]
Blackvegetable » 7 minutes ago » wrote: ↑7 minutes ago
Very simple questions...
From which you are running...
Blackvegetable » 7 minutes ago » wrote: ↑7 minutes ago
Very simple questions...
From which you are running...
15 Aug 2026 11:50 am
More yapyap...Vegas » 3 minutes ago » wrote: ↑ The challenge proves all of it. All! Which is why your cowardly *** refuses to take the challenge.
Didn't click it. I will not entertain your stalking.
Define it yourself. I am not your mother.
Show me evidence..
Like this
https://archive.liberalforum.net/p/140699
15 Aug 2026 11:53 am
Will have to see this later…I almost miss “Tuck Tuck” Carlson’s fake working class appeal where he rails against the “elites”Vegas » 51 minutes ago » wrote: ↑ Did anyone watch their debate? K'fools spent 300k to get his *** handed to him.
It was a bloodbath. Candace was calm and beat the shot out of him. I don't think there was even one point that K'fools won in that whole debate. Usually, there is at least a few wins that the overall loser could take home, but he got shut out. If the guy refuses to debate like an adult, then he at least needs to control his body language. When he gets cornered, he shakes. He always does that in every debate.
It is uncanny how similar @Blackvegetable debate strategy is with K'fools. They are 100% the same. Make a claim, then expect the opponent to disprove it. The opponent then challenges them to prove their claim, then BV/K'fools refuses to back their claim, then continues to press their opponent to prove them wrong.
Dishonest frauds debate like that incessantly. They are **** dumber than a box of rocks. K'fool tried that **** on Candace and she just demolished him.
15 Aug 2026 11:58 am
Challenge. Actually, I am proving it on your most recent OP now. And all the future ones I will be doing the same.Blackvegetable » 10 minutes ago » wrote: ↑ More yapyap...
Show me evidence..
Like this
https://archive.liberalforum.net/p/140699
Didn't click it. I will not entertain your stalking.
Define it yourself. I am not your mother.
Blackvegatble's hypcorisy summed up in one post:
[/size]
Blackvegetable » 7 minutes ago » wrote: ↑7 minutes ago
Very simple questions...
From which you are running...
Blackvegetable » 7 minutes ago » wrote: ↑7 minutes ago
Very simple questions...
From which you are running...
15 Aug 2026 12:09 pm
More yapyap..Vegas » 13 minutes ago » wrote: ↑ Challenge. Actually, I am proving it on your most recent OP now. And all the future ones I will be doing the same.
Didn't click it. I will not entertain your stalking.
Define it yourself. I am not your mother.
DMA...Define it yourself. I am not your mother.
15 Aug 2026 12:12 pm
That is what K'fools would say after he gets cornered.
Blackvegatble's hypcorisy summed up in one post:
[/size]
Blackvegetable » 7 minutes ago » wrote: ↑7 minutes ago
Very simple questions...
From which you are running...
Blackvegetable » 7 minutes ago » wrote: ↑7 minutes ago
Very simple questions...
From which you are running...
15 Aug 2026 12:21 pm
More yapyap...
15 Aug 2026 12:24 pm
Cornered. ^^^
Blackvegatble's hypcorisy summed up in one post:
[/size]
Blackvegetable » 7 minutes ago » wrote: ↑7 minutes ago
Very simple questions...
From which you are running...
Blackvegetable » 7 minutes ago » wrote: ↑7 minutes ago
Very simple questions...
From which you are running...
15 Aug 2026 4:17 pm
Yesterday 1:18 pm
Didn't click it. I will not entertain your stalking.Blackvegetable » Yesterday, 4:17 pm » wrote: ↑ https://archive.liberalforum.net/p/589680
There's so much more where these came from...
Dude...there is no **** way that you don't know what my response to these are by now. Idiot.
Blackvegatble's hypcorisy summed up in one post:
[/size]
Blackvegetable » 7 minutes ago » wrote: ↑7 minutes ago
Very simple questions...
From which you are running...
Blackvegetable » 7 minutes ago » wrote: ↑7 minutes ago
Very simple questions...
From which you are running...
Yesterday 1:24 pm
I knowVegas » 11 minutes ago » wrote: ↑ Didn't click it. I will not entertain your stalking.
Dude...there is no **** way that you don't know what my response to these are by now. Idiot.
"You know I won't read my own ****. No one does...I suck!"
Yesterday 1:32 pm
Clearly you don't, because you keep doing it as if you think something different will happen.
God you are dumb.
Blackvegatble's hypcorisy summed up in one post:
[/size]
Blackvegetable » 7 minutes ago » wrote: ↑7 minutes ago
Very simple questions...
From which you are running...
Blackvegetable » 7 minutes ago » wrote: ↑7 minutes ago
Very simple questions...
From which you are running...
Yesterday 3:15 pm
I saw a few frames of the great debate.. It looked like RFKs brainworm got in Andrew's boot. It was shaking like the document sandpaper voice was holding the other day..Vegas » Today, 1:32 pm » wrote: ↑ Clearly you don't, because you keep doing it as if you think something different will happen.
God you are dumb.
DUMP THE TRUMP SLUMP 2026!
Bump Caps Recommended..
Bump Caps Recommended..
Yesterday 3:17 pm
The video is easily searchable..Blackvegetable » Today, 1:24 pm » wrote: ↑ I know
"You know I won't read my own ****. No one does...I suck!"
Links seem to be very hard to come by for some of the boner jokes here.
DUMP THE TRUMP SLUMP 2026!
Bump Caps Recommended..
Bump Caps Recommended..
Yesterday 3:19 pm
I didn't watch it, but I do know the politics behind it and who really paid for. It wasn't ******.Vegas » Yesterday, 11:05 am » wrote: ↑ Did anyone watch their debate? K'fools spent 300k to get his *** handed to him.
It was a bloodbath. Candace was calm and beat the shot out of him. I don't think there was even one point that K'fools won in that whole debate. Usually, there is at least a few wins that the overall loser could take home, but he got shut out. If the guy refuses to debate like an adult, then he at least needs to control his body language. When he gets cornered, he shakes. He always does that in every debate.
It is uncanny how similar @Blackvegetable debate strategy is with K'fools. They are 100% the same. Make a claim, then expect the opponent to disprove it. The opponent then challenges them to prove their claim, then BV/K'fools refuses to back their claim, then continues to press their opponent to prove them wrong.
Dishonest frauds debate like that incessantly. They are **** dumber than a box of rocks. K'fool tried that **** on Candace and she just demolished him.
It amuses me to hear that he did not debate like an adult, because his entire shtick was to be the adult in the room and make Cnadace look like a hysteric. The money was spent in hopes that Candace might say something off the cuff that ******'s masters/owners could use to sue Candace.
When you complain, ur friends roll their eyes and ur enemies rejoice
"Because I SAY I am" is a todler's tantrum, not "science"
You cannot betray me - only yourself, to me.
Who cuts off your dick is not a friend
An opinion you won't defend is not your own
Humanity's Law of the Jungle: Survival NOT of the fittest, but of the tribe
When peeing in the pool, stand on the edge
If gender is not sex, why should a gender claim change what sex you shower with?
"Because I SAY I am" is a todler's tantrum, not "science"
You cannot betray me - only yourself, to me.
Who cuts off your dick is not a friend
An opinion you won't defend is not your own
Humanity's Law of the Jungle: Survival NOT of the fittest, but of the tribe
When peeing in the pool, stand on the edge
If gender is not sex, why should a gender claim change what sex you shower with?
Who is online
In total there are 4640 users online :: 10 registered, 16 bots, and 4614 guests
Registered users: Johnny You, *Roshambo, Blackvegetable, Buck Naked, Squatchman, ROG62, RebelGator, Beekeeper, Deezer Shoove, Huey
Bots: Bolt, facebookexternalhit, okhttp, LCC, MicroMessenger, ADmantX, GPTBot, CriteoBot, Googlebot, proximic, bingbot, YandexBot, curl/7, Mediapartners-Google, Applebot, Baiduspider