Liberal Forum

Too bad BV our very own Fake News Dickhead didn't make the cut and get included

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_ZdhoJ_SeTw

Watch FOX, Newsmacks, One Asshole Network, Or Noose Nation.

nefarious101 » 30 Jul 2025, 7:14 am » wrote: ↑

30 Jul 2025, 7:14 am

Too bad BV our very own Fake News Dickhead didn't make the cut and get included

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_ZdhoJ_SeTw

Influencer mom....

JohnnyYou » Today, 5:51 pm » wrote: ↑

Today, 5:51 pm

Watch FOX, Newsmacks, One Asshole Network, Or Noose Nation.

Says Mr. Vanity Fair.

SouthernFried » Yesterday, 8:26 pm » wrote: ↑

Yesterday, 8:26 pm

Says Mr. Vanity Fair.

I gotta hand it to Fox, they are very close to a full throw under the bus.

Have you heard about Dan Bongino's and Tucker Carlson's interaction yet?

Tucker has Thomas Crooks social media posts.  He had them when the government was saying none existed. Tucker called his good friend Dan and there are recorded text chains that Tucker said he has.  Dan got super pissed at Tucker and yelled at him "Ask Trump why he he shut down the investigation"

Would you shut down an investigation into an assasination attempt on yourself?

Release the Thomas Crooks File.. from the TrumpStien Files. ^^^^^^^^

JohnnyYou » Today, 3:31 am » wrote: ↑

Today, 3:31 am

I gotta hand it to Fox, they are very close to a full throw under the bus.

Have you heard about Dan Bongino's and Tucker Carlson's interaction yet?

Tucker has Thomas Crooks social media posts.  He had them when the government was saying none existed. Tucker called his good friend Dan and there are recorded text chains that Tucker said he has.  Dan got super pissed at Tucker and yelled at him "Ask Trump why he he shut down the investigation"

Would you shut down an investigation into an assasination attempt on yourself?

Whether an individual would shut down an investigation into their own attempted assassination depends heavily on motive. Closing or limiting such an inquiry could fuel suspicions of a cover-up, whereas a completely transparent investigation typically serves to clear a victim’s name and reassure the public.The specific claims you are referencing stem from a public feud between former colleagues Tucker Carlson and Dan Bongino:The Claim: Carlson alleged on a podcast that after he came into possession of online posts made by the would-be assassin, Thomas Crooks, he confronted the FBI. Carlson claimed that Deputy Director Dan Bongino became "terrified" and "hysterical" before ultimately telling him to take it up with Trump, alleging Trump personally shut down the investigation into the shooting.The Response: Bongino publicly denied the claims. He released screenshots of their text exchanges on his own podcast, stating that he merely informed Carlson that Trump had been briefed and was satisfied, rather than stating the president personally killed the investigation. Bongino dismissed Carlson's assertions as baseless, evidence-free conspiracy theories.The FBI Position: Regarding Carlson's initial accusation that the FBI lied about the existence of Crooks' social media posts, the agency issued a public rebuttal. The FBI stated that it never claimed Crooks had "no online footprint" and pushed back against Carlson's narrative.You can read more about the clash between the two conservative commentators on The Independent and follow the FBI's statements regarding the investigation on Newsweek.

What's your next "source"? Medias Touch? Perhaps the Young Turds?

SouthernFried » 8 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

8 minutes ago

What's your next "source"? Medias Touch? Perhaps the Young Turds?

At least I have some sources..  You wander in a jungle of misinformation.

Do you or @nefarious101  care to join the adult community here and provide some substance to your views?  Or are we just supposed to take it on 31st arrival faith that you are always right with absolutely nothing to back you up.

Perception is Reality.  Your glass brain is going to shatter like an over powered light bulb when you finally get screwed in..






 

JohnnyYou » 7 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

7 minutes ago

At least I have some sources..  You wander in a jungle of misinformation.

Do you or @nefarious101  care to join the adult community here and provide some substance to your views?  Or are we just supposed to take it on 31st arrival faith that you are always right with absolutely nothing to back you up.

Perception is Reality.  Your glass brain is going to shatter like an over powered light bulb when you finally get screwed in..

 Such as VanityFair?
 

SouthernFried » 14 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

14 minutes ago

 Such as VanityFair?

I don't subscribe.

You may want to. I believe they discuss homosexual issues.

All I know is supposedly the picture was published in a vanity fair article about the movie made by skydance about trump of a newsprint about an elite party at the now Trumpfamous Studio 54.I can't rule out the possibility that it was faked.  Bill Gates wants to eliminate the story all together..

Seriously, a year ago I got a lot different results on AI search of the image. I didn't keep a file.

It is most definitely Roy Cohn in the image in the faerie headress..  The costume is a damn good photoshop for the year it was published and .. wait for it..   COPYRIGHTED!

Am I right @Blackvegetable  ?   I think the young pooperschnipple could find some kind of written article that our story is fake??
 

JohnnyYou » 9 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

9 minutes ago

I don't subscribe.

You may want to. I believe they discuss homosexual issues.

All I know is supposedly the picture was published in a vanity fair article about the movie made by skydance about trump of a newsprint about an elite party at the now Trumpfamous Studio 54.I can't rule out the possibility that it was faked.  Bill Gates wants to eliminate the story all together..

Seriously, a year ago I got a lot different results on AI search of the image. I didn't keep a file.

It is most definitely Roy Cohn in the image in the faerie headress..  The costume is a damn good photoshop for the year it was published and .. wait for it..   COPYRIGHTED!

Am I right @Blackvegetable  ?   I think the young pooperschnipple could find some kind of written article that our story is fake??

All I know is supposedly the picture was published in a vanity fair article

Why is the fact of this COPYRIGHTED image so difficult to accept?

https://www.vanityfair.com/hollywood/20 ... t-evil-men

SouthernFried » 19 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

19 minutes ago

 Such as VanityFair?

yes.

Now tell me why not.

SouthernFried » 29 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

29 minutes ago

 Such as VanityFair?

SEI Johnny isn't the sharpest knife in the drawer

he's more like a butter knife in a Steak house

Blackvegetable » 10 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

10 minutes ago

yes.

Now tell me why not.

Johnny claims it's a homosexual source....why would anyone believe a rag published by and for homosexuals wouldn't also have other mental deformities?

JohnnyYou » 37 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

37 minutes ago

At least I have some sources..  You wander in a jungle of misinformation.

Do you or @nefarious101  care to join the adult community here and provide some substance to your views?  Or are we just supposed to take it on 31st arrival faith that you are always right with absolutely nothing to back you up.

Perception is Reality.  Your glass brain is going to shatter like an over powered light bulb when you finally get screwed in..

You're sources are **** DEI Johnny

you are a sleep walker....ready to go with your eyes closed and your mind turned off

If people don't give a source your should look it up for yourself....don't be stereotypically lazy.

It's amazing how Low Information you Lefty's are...and you rely on media that is notorious from scamming and hoaxing the public

Smugness isn't a convincing argument...you need to do better

JohnnyYou » Today, 3:31 am » wrote: ↑

Today, 3:31 am

I gotta hand it to Fox, they are very close to a full throw under the bus.

Have you heard about Dan Bongino's and Tucker Carlson's interaction yet?

Tucker has Thomas Crooks social media posts.  He had them when the government was saying none existed. Tucker called his good friend Dan and there are recorded text chains that Tucker said he has.  Dan got super pissed at Tucker and yelled at him "Ask Trump why he he shut down the investigation"

Would you shut down an investigation into an assasination attempt on yourself?

Whether an individual would shut down an investigation into their own attempted assassination depends heavily on motive. Closing or limiting such an inquiry could fuel suspicions of a cover-up, whereas a completely transparent investigation typically serves to clear a victim’s name and reassure the public.The specific claims you are referencing stem from a public feud between former colleagues Tucker Carlson and Dan Bongino:The Claim: Carlson alleged on a podcast that after he came into possession of online posts made by the would-be assassin, Thomas Crooks, he confronted the FBI. Carlson claimed that Deputy Director Dan Bongino became "terrified" and "hysterical" before ultimately telling him to take it up with Trump, alleging Trump personally shut down the investigation into the shooting.The Response: Bongino publicly denied the claims. He released screenshots of their text exchanges on his own podcast, stating that he merely informed Carlson that Trump had been briefed and was satisfied, rather than stating the president personally killed the investigation. Bongino dismissed Carlson's assertions as baseless, evidence-free conspiracy theories.The FBI Position: Regarding Carlson's initial accusation that the FBI lied about the existence of Crooks' social media posts, the agency issued a public rebuttal. The FBI stated that it never claimed Crooks had "no online footprint" and pushed back against Carlson's narrative.You can read more about the clash between the two conservative commentators on The Independent and follow the FBI's statements regarding the investigation on Newsweek.

  It's because the "assassination attempt" was a staged event. 
 
 

RebelGator » 11 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

11 minutes ago

Johnny claims it's a homosexual source....why would anyone believe a rag published by and for homosexuals wouldn't also have other mental deformities?

Have you learned who Roy Cohn was yet?

https://youtu.be/ptTc17stBkw?is=KEC92D16yV9bj9gZ
 

Blackvegetable » 6 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

6 minutes ago

Have you learned who Roy Cohn was yet?

https://youtu.be/ptTc17stBkw?is=KEC92D16yV9bj9gZ

Longer than you've been jacking off over that picture.  

Blackvegetable » Yesterday, 8:17 pm » wrote: ↑

Yesterday, 8:17 pm

Influencer mom....

This is an attempt on the Dickhead's part to interact without having to use copy/paste of other people's thoughts and words

as you can see....it's a fail....he even set his dickhead *** up to get blasted again....a total dickhead maneuver 


Hey LGVTP dickhead,,,,

You being a dickhead caused you walk right into it again

here are your influencer moms...one of the reasons you are losing...

nefarious101 » 3 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

3 minutes ago

This is an attempt on the Dickhead's part to interact without having to use copy/paste of other people's thoughts and words


 

You posted a video....of an influencer.