User avatar
Bigsky
03 Nov 2017 06:33 pm
03 Nov 2017 06:33 pm
Bigsky
User avatar
when you intentionally block a witness from testifying with threat of criminal prosecution it is called tampering with evidence. blocking the fbi agent might give new life to and cancel the statute of limitations in the case https://freedomdaily.com/hillary-obama- ... k-testify/...
— LiberalForum Archive
User avatar
Nobody
03 Nov 2017 06:33 pm
Nobody
User avatar
...
— LiberalForum Archive
User avatar
roadkill
03 Nov 2017 06:32 pm
03 Nov 2017 06:32 pm
roadkill
User avatar
"Why is this issue being brought up 7 years after the fact when Republicans in Congress had years to investigate it?" Because Congress was not informed until well after the fact...that should meet your "Time-Line" requirement. Misty generously teaches all of us about "Time-Lines" that are vali...
— LiberalForum Archive
User avatar
Nobody
03 Nov 2017 06:32 pm
Nobody
User avatar
...
— LiberalForum Archive
User avatar
Nobody
03 Nov 2017 06:29 pm
03 Nov 2017 06:29 pm
Nobody
User avatar
Republicans controlled the Congressional committees for most of his administration. They could have had all the hearings they wanted on Uranium One. They didn't. They sure weren't shy when it came to investigating Benghazi. Now after 7 years it's suddenly a huge scandal? Sorry. Doesn't pass the sm...
— LiberalForum Archive
User avatar
Bigsky
03 Nov 2017 06:07 pm
03 Nov 2017 06:07 pm
Bigsky
User avatar
it really isn't a moot point...and to bring light to the corruption of the Obama administration and the Clinton term as secretary of state is important. hell the left brought up **** past the statute of limitation on trump during the election, Mueller went back further than 7 years on trumps taxes.....
— LiberalForum Archive
User avatar
Nobody
03 Nov 2017 06:01 pm
03 Nov 2017 06:01 pm
Nobody
User avatar
Uranium One was 7 years ago. Even if something illegal was done, the statute of limitations for most federal crimes is 5 years, so it's a moot point. Why is this issue being brought up 7 years after the fact when Republicans in Congress had years to investigate it? Unpacking Uranium One: Hype and ...
— LiberalForum Archive
User avatar
Nobody
03 Nov 2017 05:53 pm
03 Nov 2017 05:53 pm
Nobody
User avatar
More off handed comments. Trump paused to hit Sessions with yet another indignity just before he left the White House for a 12-day Asia trip increasingly colored by his domestic political troubles. Asked if he would fire the attorney general if he doesn't investigate his Democratic political riva...
— LiberalForum Archive
User avatar
Bigsky
03 Nov 2017 05:40 pm
03 Nov 2017 05:40 pm
Bigsky
User avatar
come on misty...Mueller is balls deep in uranium one and hillarys rico violations and money laundering in collusion with Putin. the list is LONG the crimes she committed....and congress is having to face it. I know you don't want this to be true, but could you please just be happy for me? I promise...
— LiberalForum Archive
User avatar
Nobody
03 Nov 2017 05:35 pm
03 Nov 2017 05:35 pm
Nobody
User avatar
Republican members of Congress apparently now taking their marching orders straight from Sean Hannity. Republicans just introduced a resolution to remove Mueller from the Trump-Russia investigation. WASHINGTON — A group of conservative Republican lawmakers introduced a resolution on Friday callin...
— LiberalForum Archive