User avatar
RichClem
06 Jan 2015 12:44 pm
RichClem
User avatar
. Translation into honest English: you can't refute the historical reality, so you babble more idiocy....
— LiberalForum Archive
User avatar
Cannonpointer
06 Jan 2015 12:41 pm
Cannonpointer
User avatar
So, to recap: You were laughing and mocking the number, and then you were shifting blame instead. I made you change lies - that makes you my punk....
— LiberalForum Archive
User avatar
Cannonpointer
06 Jan 2015 12:39 pm
Cannonpointer
User avatar
"REVENUES" = TAXES, dumb ****. Reagan raised taxes in 7 of 8 years, moron. Here are 11 examples of Reagan tax increases - have fun, kid: Legislation Billions of Dollars Tax Equity and Fiscal Responsibility Act 57.3 Highway Revenue Act of 1982 4.9 Social Security Amendments of 1983 24...
— LiberalForum Archive
User avatar
RichClem
06 Jan 2015 12:05 pm
RichClem
User avatar
. The reality is, spending under Reagan was driven by liberal Dems and vital military spending. Most spending restraint under Clinton was because of Gingrich and Repubs. Lying psychotics try to reverse that historical reality. Babble away....
— LiberalForum Archive
User avatar
RichClem
06 Jan 2015 12:03 pm
RichClem
User avatar
I cannot stop you from telling blatant lies, true. Nothing I can do about it....
— LiberalForum Archive
User avatar
Cannonpointer
06 Jan 2015 12:00 pm
Cannonpointer
User avatar
Thanks for always making it easy, you fapping moron. Here, retard. Have fun laughing at my source: http://www.usgovernmentspending.com/us_ ... chart.html Gosh, clemtard. THIS CHART^^^ Shows the shoe-blacked boy toucher spending at a higher rate than the Chimp. Looks like W was more of a conser...
— LiberalForum Archive
User avatar
RichClem
06 Jan 2015 12:00 pm
RichClem
User avatar
. Why would I bother responding to psychotic idiocy?...
— LiberalForum Archive
User avatar
RichClem
06 Jan 2015 11:58 am
RichClem
User avatar
No ****, sherlock. My point was about revenues, over which there was a huge dispute at the time....
— LiberalForum Archive
User avatar
RichClem
06 Jan 2015 11:56 am
RichClem
User avatar
1) that's a lie. 2) liberals at the time still predicted fiscal and economic disaster. Liberals were 180 degrees wrong, because there was an historic boom and revenues rose by 28%....
— LiberalForum Archive
User avatar
Cannonpointer
06 Jan 2015 11:56 am
Cannonpointer
User avatar
Revenues is what the government takes, moron. If you want to talk about GDP growth, do so. You are crowing about Reagan's sticky fingers and high taxes, *******....
— LiberalForum Archive