User avatar
Cannonpointer
19 Oct 2014 10:37 pm
Cannonpointer
User avatar
It's pretty obvious that little richie's programmers, when confronted with Obie cutting taxes, groused that those were poopy tax cuts, not "good" tax cuts. And then, finding no way on earth to tie Saul Alinski to tax cuts, one of the talking heads that moron listens to ran this gambit: "Obama's tax ...
— LiberalForum Archive
User avatar
RichClem
19 Oct 2014 10:35 pm
RichClem
User avatar
Wow, so slapping the term "meme" on that refutes documented history, right? Because that deal has been recorded in many accounts of the Reagan presidency. Now do your little troll dance....
— LiberalForum Archive
User avatar
Cannonpointer
19 Oct 2014 10:32 pm
Cannonpointer
User avatar
Nice dodge, kid. Your response to, "What would be a Keynesian tax cut" is. I did NOT! Prove it! You don;t even know what it is! Laborers? MARXISM! Keep dancing, kid....
— LiberalForum Archive
User avatar
Cannonpointer
19 Oct 2014 10:30 pm
Cannonpointer
User avatar
Apparently, the person I responded to did. He brought up the laffer curve. Do you not care about the laffer curve? Link? Abner? Is that you, Abner?...
— LiberalForum Archive
User avatar
Cannonpointer
19 Oct 2014 10:28 pm
Cannonpointer
User avatar
Good link. Great meme....
— LiberalForum Archive
User avatar
RichClem
19 Oct 2014 10:22 pm
RichClem
User avatar
How typically stupid that you call that "Reagan's" tax hike. It was Tip O'Neil's and Democrats' demand, to which Reagan only conceded in exchange for spending cuts that Tip O'Neil promised. O'Neil broke his word, and Reagan called the deal the biggest mistake of his presidency....
— LiberalForum Archive
User avatar
RichClem
19 Oct 2014 10:15 pm
RichClem
User avatar
Who care what Eisenhower knew or didn't about Economics. No one except the monbat left is even considering such a stupid tax rate. Are you advocating it? If not, what's your point?...
— LiberalForum Archive
User avatar
RichClem
19 Oct 2014 10:09 pm
RichClem
User avatar
Yes, you did try that. Here, try again. 1) You didn't cite when I've supported a Keynesian tax cut 2) You don't know what one is. 3) And you're wrong about me not wanting to help, shades of Marxism, "laborers. So you're zero for three....
— LiberalForum Archive
User avatar
Cannonpointer
19 Oct 2014 09:59 pm
Cannonpointer
User avatar
Thank you. every time I point that out about Reagan's tax increases on labor to offset his cuts on capital, your bedfellows go to lying and screeching and flapping their effeminate arms. But I did not "ignore" that - any more than I "ignored" that Obama owned a red bicycle when he was 11. The chal...
— LiberalForum Archive
User avatar
Cannonpointer
19 Oct 2014 09:57 pm
Cannonpointer
User avatar
Yes, laborers. Shades of MARXISM. Actual LABORERS! Anyhow, nice dodge....
— LiberalForum Archive