User avatar
Cannonpointer
23 Jul 2014 10:10 am
Cannonpointer
User avatar
This precisely proves my point. The Golden Rule is the one thing humans can count on forever: He who has the gold makes the rules - and Temasek follows those rules. Who sets the investment objectives? Temasek? No - Temasek FOLLOWS those objectives. And the implicit pretense that phone calls are no...
— LiberalForum Archive
User avatar
Cannonpointer
23 Jul 2014 09:53 am
Cannonpointer
User avatar
Agreed on Johnson - but so-called "free market supporters" - whatever you think that means - vote for and empower the type of people who triple our national debt, fight wars of choice off budget, give the world's most powerful communist nation unfettered access to the world's largest consumer market...
— LiberalForum Archive
User avatar
golfboy
23 Jul 2014 07:38 am
golfboy
User avatar
Is she actually finally starting to see the light? We explained this to you prior to Obamacare ever passing in 2009. Prior to Bammycare, if you had an issue you attempted to resolve it with your insurance company and if you were unable to resolve it to your satisfaction you could retain a lawyer ...
— LiberalForum Archive
User avatar
golfboy
23 Jul 2014 07:31 am
golfboy
User avatar
Sorry, but you're clearly wrong. Repetition isn't going to change that. The Employer mandate has only been delayed for small to medium businesses, not for everyone. Again, if you don't know what the law did, or how it's been modified by Obama, why are you here?...
— LiberalForum Archive
User avatar
RichClem
23 Jul 2014 07:07 am
RichClem
User avatar
Yes, but no, Carter re-inflated the dollar after to some degree Ford stabilized it and the economy, so Carter deserves the blame for his own actions and the resulting problems. And it began with LBJ, not Nixon, although he did worsen the problem. Not to mention, inflating the dollar is "acceptable...
— LiberalForum Archive
User avatar
tharock220
23 Jul 2014 12:09 am
tharock220
User avatar
And it's definitely not a situation where government took control, forced it into bankruptcy, then used the bankruptcy court(also government) to give the company to political allies....
— LiberalForum Archive
User avatar
tharock220
23 Jul 2014 12:07 am
tharock220
User avatar
Sounds to me like a privately owned company accountable to its shareholders like you see elsewhere in the world. The shareholders happen to be government here. It's not what Cannon wants it to be: a pdvsa or gazprom which are wards of the state or personal piggy banks for foolish dictators. One ...
— LiberalForum Archive
User avatar
GeorgeWashington
23 Jul 2014 12:01 am
GeorgeWashington
User avatar
An Investment Mandate from the Government to GIC sets out the terms of appointment, investment objectives, investment horizon, risk parameters and investment guidelines for managing the portfolio. The Government, which is represented by the Ministry of Finance in its dealings with GIC, neither direc...
— LiberalForum Archive
User avatar
Cannonpointer
22 Jul 2014 11:55 pm
Cannonpointer
User avatar
So they can run it into the ground and there is nothing the government can do to intervene? That your final answer? I will have to take this up later....
— LiberalForum Archive
User avatar
tharock220
22 Jul 2014 11:53 pm
tharock220
User avatar
All I'm asking is for your calculations man. You're a semi-intelligent person so I figured you could show me the arithmetic. Wrong. The Singapore government does not manage Temasek. It simply owns it. I will concede that it is socialized, nationalized, or whatever, but the company manages its own...
— LiberalForum Archive