User avatar
Nobody
02 Jan 2014 02:26 pm
Nobody
User avatar
No, you never did. The question was, "Which would be more cost effective? Routine tests and doctor's visits that would diagnose cancers early, or treating cancer in it's advanced stages? Misty: You refuse to tell us what kind of health care coverage you carry Puss, and you seem to speak about healt...
— LiberalForum Archive
User avatar
Nobody
02 Jan 2014 02:20 pm
Nobody
User avatar
You can't cover your callousness by hiding behind the fact that you are advocating that there be no law that mandates treatment for the poor in Emergency Rooms. Adding the weasel words, 'even for non-emergencies' doesn't cut it....
— LiberalForum Archive
User avatar
RichClem
02 Jan 2014 01:27 pm
RichClem
User avatar
Oh gosh, yet another dishonest smear from the troll. What do the following words mean? "even for non-emergencies." So who would die in the street if they weren't treated in an emergency room for a non-emergency?...
— LiberalForum Archive
User avatar
RichClem
02 Jan 2014 01:25 pm
RichClem
User avatar
I answered the first question and the one about emergency room visits too. So deal with your two lies before I respond to the rest of what you wrote. Who knows how many other lies you wrote? You refuse to tell us what kind of health care coverage you carry Puss, and you seem to speak about ...
— LiberalForum Archive
User avatar
Nobody
02 Jan 2014 01:17 pm
Nobody
User avatar
And there were (are) a good many people who can't afford to pay out of pocket for routine check-ups and tests and would show up already very sick in the ER. We end up paying way more after they are in the advanced stages of illness, than we would if we provided preventative care and the ability to d...
— LiberalForum Archive
User avatar
Nobody
02 Jan 2014 01:09 pm
Nobody
User avatar
No, Puss, you did not answer the question, and the rest of your answer makes no sense. You know that we pay for the uninsured who show up very ill in the ER. So since we are paying anyway, it would make a lot more sense to diagnose their illnesses early, so they can be treated in a much more cost ef...
— LiberalForum Archive
User avatar
RichClem
02 Jan 2014 01:01 pm
RichClem
User avatar
It absolutely was race-baiting. Go ahead and bleat about the difference....
— LiberalForum Archive
User avatar
Huey
02 Jan 2014 12:58 pm
Huey
User avatar
There were people not like you who carried major medical, catestrophic and long term care with but paid out of pocket for routine check ups and tests. They CHOSE to do so and used the money saved on premiums for their retirement, their business or whatever they wanted to use it for. A good many of...
— LiberalForum Archive
User avatar
Nobody
02 Jan 2014 12:55 pm
Nobody
User avatar
Golfboy accuses Melissa Harris-Perry and her panel of racism, yet he couldn't seem to articulate what they said that was actually racist. Golfboy posted two more times in that thread, but neither of those posts was in response to GailyBee. Typical....
— LiberalForum Archive
User avatar
RichClem
02 Jan 2014 12:42 pm
RichClem
User avatar
I answered the question, moonbat. And it's a set up, because it's not at all typical of health care treatment. I'm referring to far less serious testing and treatment. Tell me again how you long for meaningful debate? LOL As I've noted many times, it's impossible to debate with a shameless liar,...
— LiberalForum Archive