Liberal Forum

For the same reason Fox News is popular: our country is full of morons!!!...moron....

Deny the reality of the WSJ's history and Rupert's record of ousting anyone (against his own promises) who opposed his shredding of journalistic integrity. Denying reality is what Cons are best at....

Why would you pay for what you have to know is propaganda?...

Wow, good job dropping the "off topic spam" and just saying "off topic span". You're maturing. You should feel good about yourself....

With additions to some new staffing, the same journalist have written for the WSJ for years, probably decades. At this point, I'm convinced you're probably making this up....

Nope. Used to, though. Right up to 2008, when it became obvious that Rupert's poison had destroyed the WSJ's journalism and reduced them to propaganda....

You don't have a subscription to the Wall Street Journal, do you? You'd be very surprised who writes for it, that is, if you bothered to pay the $22.26 a month for it....

Rupee Murdoch and Steve Forbes are oligarchs silly....

The WSJ editorial page used to be reliably conservative in both economic outlook and social/political outlook. Paleoconservative, Chicago school, the works - rightist, but rational and predictable within their mindset. Reliable and always fact-based. That was before Rupert bought the place, fired t...

you are DONE clemmy. no one is buying. you are an amateur propagandist. Awake and aware, observant and perceptive people see right through your mask. You are more suited to addressing the people with an IQ below 40....