User avatar
Nobody
21 May 2013 06:41 pm
Nobody
User avatar
Oh so they are supposed to just accept things on good faith? Why do they have auditors? Why do they have investigators? Why even have rules?No they are not supposed to just accept anything on good faith, hence the application, hence the whole process.I can't believe that Clem actually said that the ...
— LiberalForum Archive
User avatar
RichClem
20 May 2013 03:02 pm
RichClem
User avatar
Nairn said that The U.S. prosecutors in Washington should immediately convene a grand jury with two missions: first, coming to the aid of the Guatemalan attorney general, who has just been ordered by the court to investigate all others involved in Ros Montt’s crimes, by releasing all classified U.S....
— LiberalForum Archive
User avatar
RichClem
18 May 2013 01:31 pm
RichClem
User avatar
Your own source admitted that "at least three" liberal groups had problems, likely delays. So far, 500 conservative groups have complained, many of which were bullied, intimidated, made illegal demands of. Wake up, geez. Not a single one of those political wolves in social welfare sheeps clothin...
— LiberalForum Archive
User avatar
MotherJonses
18 May 2013 01:20 pm
MotherJonses
User avatar
Your own source admitted that "at least three" liberal groups had problems, likely delays. So far, 500 conservative groups have complained, many of which were bullied, intimidated, made illegal demands of. Wake up, geez. Not a single one of those political wolves in social welfare sheeps clothin...
— LiberalForum Archive
User avatar
RichClem
18 May 2013 01:00 pm
RichClem
User avatar
This is what listing an example and citing a source looks like. Just saying they have been listed somewhere is useless ****. Your own source admitted that "at least three" liberal groups had problems, likely delays. So far, 500 conservative groups have complained, many of which were bullied, inti...
— LiberalForum Archive
User avatar
MotherJonses
18 May 2013 12:56 pm
MotherJonses
User avatar
Bulls***. Liberal groups operate under the same guidelines, few if any of which were harassed. This has been the law, the standard for decades. Obama's IRS ignored that and attempted to interfere in a presidential election, at the explicit demands of Democrats as Obama looked on and did nothing. An...
— LiberalForum Archive
User avatar
RichClem
18 May 2013 12:36 pm
RichClem
User avatar
If not, why not? This is unquestionably an abuse of power and impeachable act. No political action is not the same as community service. No they should not be allowed tax exempt status. Bulls***. Liberal groups operate under the same guidelines, few if any of which were harassed. This has be...
— LiberalForum Archive
User avatar
MotherJonses
18 May 2013 11:54 am
MotherJonses
User avatar
It is not up to the IRS to determine beforehand if group is political or if it is not. They are supposed to assume requests are made in good faith. So de facto, the IRS was specifically picking out conservative groups and delaying, bulling and intimidating them. It was a violation of Americans' ci...
— LiberalForum Archive
User avatar
MotherJonses
18 May 2013 11:48 am
MotherJonses
User avatar
If not, why not? This is unquestionably an abuse of power and impeachable act. No political action is not the same as community service. No they should not be allowed tax exempt status. And there is not one bit of evidence that anyone outside of the IRS knew about the filter being used to sort t...
— LiberalForum Archive
User avatar
RichClem
18 May 2013 11:02 am
RichClem
User avatar
Hey asshat, you do know that everything you listed the constitution, Obama-care, gay marriage. They are all political. There is no social welfare in any of those. If that is what they were about than they should have been investigated and they should have been denied. It is not up to the IRS to de...
— LiberalForum Archive