Liberal Forum

If I had said he grew it BY 154%, then yeah. But I said, "TO." It's a WORD problem, son. You have to understand the WORDS to compute the math. The preposition "TO" is a very different math instruction than the preposition "BY."...

I just used your own numbers to show you lied. Open wide and swallow your failure. Prepare to have your *** kicked by your own numbers again. 1977 4.6 1978 5.6 1979 3.2 1980 -0.2 1981 2.6 Your graph shows Carter's number at 3.4% average growth during his Presidency 1977 through 1980 (4.6 + 5....

Prove my sources are partisan, moonbat. And you post no alternative numbes. You do not disagree with my numbers, AT ALL. You merely make weak attempts to mock my source - again, not by any claim of partisanship and not by any claim of inaccuracy. Just by an irrelevant ad hominem. So you got nothi...

Goofy's first attempt is a desperate restating of the conservative mainstream media narrative - not shocking. No evidence, no refutation, just bluster - a chip off the old clemtard....

That's funny. Two of Ford's last three years were in the negative, and you characterized that as a "stable, growing economy." ONE of Carter's last three years was MARGINALLY negative, and you characterize that in terms just short of apocalyptic. You seem to be a bit of a hack, clemtard....

Prepare to have your *** kicked by your own numbers again. 1977 4.6 1978 5.6 1979 3.2 1980 -0.2 1981 2.6 Your graph shows Carter's number at 3.4% average growth during his Presidency 1977 through 1980 (4.6 + 5.6 + 3.2 + -0.2) / 4 = 3.4 1978 through 1981 (5.6 + 3.2 + -0.2 + 2.6) / 4 = 2.8 According ...

Oh gosh, a silly Nazi comparison. Mental illness is such a sad thing to see....

Please show your undeceptive math, then. I am not staying your hand....

It's beyond doubt that Carter and Dems were crashing the economy, not that moonbats have any clue what accepted reality is. However, typically, you avoided the central point; stats mean nothing if things like direction aren't taken into account. Carter left an economy plunging down into chaos and ...

Look again. I never said it grew by 154%. Read BEFORE you post and no re-reading will be necessary. I said he grew the economy TO 154% of what it was when he took it over - and that means he turned it over to Reagan at just over half the size it was when he got it from Ford. Still - nice try....