User avatar
golfboy
16 Feb 2014 01:16 pm
golfboy
User avatar
Why do you keep ranting about sources? Have you realized yet that your own graph and numbers confirmed my statement about Carter and debunked yours? Your graph shows Carter's number at 3.4% average growth during his Presidency 1977 through 1980 (4.6 + 5.6 + 3.2 + -0.2) / 4 = 3.4 1978 through 1981 (...
— LiberalForum Archive
User avatar
Cannonpointer
16 Feb 2014 01:15 pm
Cannonpointer
User avatar
And, enter the fallacies: "As is well know," as Josef Goebbels used to say......
— LiberalForum Archive
User avatar
Cannonpointer
16 Feb 2014 01:13 pm
Cannonpointer
User avatar
Nope. Clem will harrumph and repeat the conservative media narrative. That's it. I told ya - I've watched this clown for years. The closest you will get to a source is a self-righteous claim that he USED to source, and it's your fault you were not present to pay attention. But that's a lie. He nev...
— LiberalForum Archive
User avatar
crimsongulf
16 Feb 2014 01:06 pm
crimsongulf
User avatar
Only an observation on the nattering nabobs....
— LiberalForum Archive
User avatar
Cannonpointer
16 Feb 2014 01:03 pm
Cannonpointer
User avatar
OOOH! An irrelevant ad hominem - the contards are hot this morning! Such a BLISTERING "rebuttal!"...
— LiberalForum Archive
User avatar
golfboy
16 Feb 2014 01:01 pm
golfboy
User avatar
Prepare to have your *** kicked by your own numbers again. 1977 4.6 1978 5.6 1979 3.2 1980 -0.2 1981 2.6 Your graph shows Carter's number at 3.4% average growth during his Presidency 1977 through 1980 (4.6 + 5.6 + 3.2 + -0.2) / 4 = 3.4 1978 through 1981 (5.6 + 3.2 + -0.2 + 2.6) / 4 = 2.8 Accordin...
— LiberalForum Archive
User avatar
Cannonpointer
16 Feb 2014 01:00 pm
Cannonpointer
User avatar
There's a remedy for that sideswipe to the OP. Present alternative numbers or an alternative explanation for those numbers. Just remember to incorporate Post # 4 in your critique, since it goes on to break down raw debt vs. debt to GDP ratio - reagan loses either way, of course - but the second way ...
— LiberalForum Archive
User avatar
crimsongulf
16 Feb 2014 12:59 pm
crimsongulf
User avatar
So, are you saying that we would have been better off with Carter? If so, how do you think he would have changed history....
— LiberalForum Archive
User avatar
Cannonpointer
16 Feb 2014 12:57 pm
Cannonpointer
User avatar
In the OP, yes. To account for inflation, you have to look at the debt to GDP ratio as the standard of measure. I did it in a follow-on post: There ya go. I accounted for inflation....
— LiberalForum Archive
User avatar
greatnpowerfuloz
16 Feb 2014 12:55 pm
greatnpowerfuloz
User avatar
By lowering the marginal tax on higher income brackets and raising them on the lower income brackets. By relying more heavily on payroll tax and new investment tax for revenue than on taxes on higher earners and capital gains (which he subsequently raised back up to 28% after cutting them to 20%). ...
— LiberalForum Archive