User avatar
Silverfox
16 Feb 2014 09:02 am
Silverfox
User avatar
If you "grow" to 100% of your height last year, you had zero growth. Cannon said, "In 4 years, carter grew the economy to 154% of where he took over. It was 2.086 trillion in 77 when he took office, and 3.211 trillion for 81 - his last fiscal budget". Back to you....
— LiberalForum Archive
User avatar
tharock220
16 Feb 2014 08:57 am
tharock220
User avatar
lolwut.....did you drop out of school in third grade like Cannon??? If what you're saying is true then 100% growth would imply zero growth son. I'll let you find out you're wrong rather than prove it to you though....
— LiberalForum Archive
User avatar
Silverfox
16 Feb 2014 08:55 am
Silverfox
User avatar
Ummm. No. It would mean it had grown to 1.54 times the size it was before. Ironic post?...
— LiberalForum Archive
User avatar
Silverfox
16 Feb 2014 08:52 am
Silverfox
User avatar
OK. Here are your questions: Q: What's the average altitude of plane that starts and 20,000 feet and begins to nosedive? A: There is insufficient data to calculate an average. Nonsense question. Q: What's the average altitude of same plane after a competent pilot takes over at 5,000 feet and bri...
— LiberalForum Archive
User avatar
tharock220
16 Feb 2014 08:49 am
tharock220
User avatar
154% implies the economy would more than double in size. Since that didn't happen I'll let you feel silly about your inability to do third grade arithmetic before dealing with the rest of your post....
— LiberalForum Archive
User avatar
RichClem
16 Feb 2014 08:43 am
RichClem
User avatar
No, I don't waste my time for moonbats who stonewall my questions and my points, as you have every time. It would be a complete and utter waste of time. This is not a matter of debate or dispute. No one with the slightest knowledge or common sense would claim that Carter was better on the economy ...
— LiberalForum Archive
User avatar
TheAmerican
16 Feb 2014 08:40 am
TheAmerican
User avatar
...
— LiberalForum Archive
User avatar
Silverfox
16 Feb 2014 08:21 am
Silverfox
User avatar
They show GDP for the years prior to Carter (so that you can show how wonderful everything was then) through the Carter years (to show how he drove the economy into the ground) through to the end of Reagan (to show how he heroically saved the world). It give GPD by year as well as showing GDP gro...
— LiberalForum Archive
User avatar
RichClem
16 Feb 2014 08:16 am
RichClem
User avatar
No, those stats go in so many different directions, only someone with zero understanding of Economics would cite them en masse. Only the hopelessly clueless would put Carter anywhere near Reagan, let alone above him on the economy....
— LiberalForum Archive
User avatar
crimsongulf
16 Feb 2014 08:14 am
crimsongulf
User avatar
Well, I guess when the current incompetent is in office it is only fitting that the left attempts to change 25 yr old history. I am loving the coming November....
— LiberalForum Archive