Liberal Forum

So you are jumping in to maintain scrupulous integrity in the matter of that side ssue, while looking past the original and larger issue from which it sprang - that being the contested utterances of mr. trump - that about size it up, captain saveaho? And then you're going to be convinced that I tr...

That's my point. It was a shot at goof....

Nope. I am seriously insisting he did not change the way the U6/U3 is counted. Unless YOU ARE insisting he was president in 1994....

Not exactly what trump said, note your edit before and after, but it is a pants on fire statement based on how he got the number: http://www.politifact.com/truth-o-meter ... e-42-perc/...

Are you seriously insisting that Reagan was pResident in 1994?...

Trump: "....unemployment at 42%...." Kasich: "....I'm a democrat..." Are you going to deny a direct quote in one but not the other? Sucks when your own hypocritical standards get turn on you huh?...

No. But I didn't see anyone claiming he was. I saw a claim that Reagan changed how U3 or U6 unemployment is counted. That would be impossible because it was done in 94/96 and he wasn't president. He did change how service members were counted, counting them as employed. Which is true....

Who are you to call for reasonable behavior? You were shown trump stating with his mouth that unemployment was 42% - yet perist in your north american man boy love association narrative. I am simply refuting your thesis that reagan was this nation's pResident in 1994. That was your claim and it ...

Just juttin' my chin at a chin jutter, boss. What happens from there is gonna be just between us chin jutters. I didn't see any link proving his claim that Reagan was pResident in 94 - did you?...

Reagan changed the CPI, not the method to count the U6 unemployment rate: Question: You are already in depression territory, not approachment. The statistic from the BLS is one of the reasons the economic crisis went undetected for so long — an economic indicator that is deceptive. The statistic is...