Liberal Forum

Are you being contrary because you believe what you are saying although GBs link says it was changed in 1994 OR is that boring today so you want to invent a flame war? And if so, will it be great?...

Come on man, I was laughing at your claim that Reagan was President when the unemployment number scheme was last changed. Don't be an *** about being wrong. Or at least try not to be such an obvious ***....

And this proves Reagan was Prssident in 1994 how?...

I HEARD golfboy sucks dicks, but the *** will still think it's saying me he's a dick sucker - not the guy I heard it from. In FAIRNESS, we bug spray golfboi....

In fairness, Trump said he had heard it as if it were credible and golfboy defended that figure. But Trump after throwing around a half dozen uncredible numbers finally hedged on "probably 20%" It was all very scientific you see and it's up to us to disprove his wild accusation....

You mean where he said it was 21%?...

I already supplied one to Oz when she asked, but here's another: http://www.forbes.com/sites/greatspecul ... 3bcf153438 In 1994, the BLS changed the way in which it counts “discouraged” workers for the U-3 index. If one is unemployed for more than 52 weeks, even if one continues to look for employme...

Link, *** hat?...

It's only been directly quoted to you in large font, *** licker....

Wow, I didn't know Reagan was President in 1994. Well, that IS news....